Web
and Book design,
Copyright, Kellscraft Studio 1999-2021 (Return to Web Text-ures) |
Click
Here to return to
The Religion of Ancient Scandinavia Content Page Return to the Previous Chapter |
(HOME)
|
CHAPTER
III TEMPLES AND IMAGES In
common with other peoples, the ancient Scandinavians erected special buildings
in which to worship their gods, and in which their images were placed. These
temples (called hof, goða-hof, goða-hús, and blót-hús)
must not be thought of as in any way comparable to those erected by the more
cultured Aryan races, such as the Greeks and Romans. It is true that Adam of
Bremen describes that at Upsala in Sweden, which he calls nobilissimum
templum, as being 'all of gold,' while a note to the passage says that it
was surrounded by 'a golden chain hanging on the pinnacles of the building, and
seen glittering afar by those who approach the place'; but it is very doubtful
how far this description is trustworthy. In any case the Upsala temple would
naturally be much superior to those in less central localities; from other
indications it appears to have been specially well endowed with landed and
other property. Unfortunately there is no evidence from which any general idea
of the heathen temples in Sweden and Denmark can be obtained. In Norway they
were, like the ordinary houses, constructed of timber, and in many cases were
probably of small size and insignificant appearance. Mention has already been
made of the temple of Thor in the island of Mostr, which Thorolf took down and
carried off to Iceland when he went to settle there. The same thing is told of
Thorhadd, who was priest at Mærin in Thrandheim; he also took down the temple,
and carried with him the temple-mould and the chief pillars. Some of the
buildings, no doubt, may have been more imposing, and even to some extent
furnished with costly ornaments. When Olaf Tryggvason gave orders to burn down
Earl Hákon's temple at Hladir, 'he made them take all the treasure and
ornaments out of the temple and off the images of the gods.' A large gold ring
was also removed from the temple door, but it afterwards proved to be only
brass internally. It may also be noted that various accounts of temples speak
of them as being lighted by glass windows 'so that there was no shadow anywhere
in them.' Beside the great temple at Upsala there was a sacred grove, and the
evidence of place-names shows that similar groves existed elsewhere in Sweden
and Denmark: as regards Norway and Iceland there is no positive information on
this head. Of
the temple which Thorolf erected at his Icelandic home on Thorsness an
interesting description is given in Eyrbyggja Saga, which is thus the
chief source for what knowledge we have on the subject. It is described as a
great house, with doors on the side-walls, nearer to one end of it than the
other. In from these doors stood the chief pillars, and in these there were
nails, which were known by the name of regin-nails (regin was one
of the names for the gods, but its precise meaning here is not certain). The
part of the building lying inward from these pillars was a great sanctuary. At
the inner end there was a smaller building 'of the same form as the choir in
churches is now'; and here, in the middle of the floor, stood a pedestal of the
nature of an altar. On this lay a ring weighing two ounces, on which all oaths
had to be sworn. It was the duty of the temple-priest to wear this ring on his
hand at all assemblies. On the pedestal stood also the sacrificial bowl (hlaut-bolli),
and in this were placed the sacrificial twigs (hlaut-teinar), by means
of which the blood of the sacrifice (hlaut-blóð) was sprinkled upon
those present at the ceremony. 'This was the blood from those animals that were
offered to the gods.' Round about this altar the images of the gods were
arranged. All those living in the district had to pay toll to the temple, and
were bound to attend the temple-priest on all expeditions, 'as thingmen are now
bound to attend their chiefs.' On the other hand, the priest had to keep up the
temple and not allow it to fall into decay, and to hold in it the sacrificial
feasts. In
the late and fictitious Kjalnesinga Saga there is given a similar
description of a temple, which may possibly have some basis in local tradition.
It is described as having been a hundred and twenty feet long, and sixty broad.
At the inner end was a circular annex, the shape of which suggested a cap or
hood; this had windows, and was hung with tapestry. Thor was the chief god
there, and stood in the middle, with the other gods on each side of him. In
front of them was an altar with an iron plate on the top, on which a fire was
kept constantly burning: 'they called that hallowed fire.' The silver ring on
which oaths were sworn, and the bowl for the sacrificial blood, are also
mentioned, but the account of them may be derived from the passage in Eyrbyggja
Saga already quoted. In a
much more reliable source, Landnámabók, there occurs the following
passage relating to the ring and its use. 'A ring of two ounces or more in
weight had to lie on the altar in each chief temple. Each priest had to wear
the ring on his arm at all assemblies over which he himself presided, having
previously reddened it in the blood of the animal which he himself had
sacrificed there. Every man who required to do legal business at a law court
had first to take an oath on that ring, and name two or more witnesses. "I
name [M. and N.] witnesses herein," he had to say, "that I take an
oath on the ring, a lawful oath, — so help me Frey and Njörd and the Almighty
God, as I shall pursue (or defend) this suit, or bear witness, or give verdict
or judgment, according to what I know to be most right and true and in
accordance with the law."' In general agreement with this is the account
given in Víga-Glúms Saga: 'That man who was to take a temple-oath took
in his hand a silver ring which was reddened in the blood of the sacrificed ox,
and which had to weigh not less than three ounces.' In taking the oath, Glúm is
represented as using the words, 'I take a temple-oath on the ring, and I say to
the god,' etc.; here the names of Frey and Njörd are omitted.1 While
Iceland was being colonised from Norway, the place and number of the temples
would depend on the religious zeal of the settlers in the various districts,
but when a fixed constitution was adopted in the year 930 special regulations
were made with reference to this. 'The land was divided into quarters, and
there were to be three places of assembly in each quarter, and three chief
temples in each assembly-district. Men who were noted for intelligence and just
dealing were selected to have charge of the temples; these had to appoint the
law-courts at the assemblies, and to superintend the legal proceedings there.
Each man had to give toll to the temple, as they now give toll to the church.'
References to the payment of this tax are not infrequent in the sagas, and one
of the results of the preaching of Christianity by Thorvald and Bishop Frederic
in 981-985 was that in the north of Iceland 'many men abandoned sacrifices and
broke their idols, and some would not pay the temple-tax.' We also meet with
such remarks as, 'the men of Geitland had to maintain half of the temple along
with Tungu-Odd.' The chief temples were thus legally endowed religious
buildings, but it would appear that there were others which were the private
property of individuals, and no doubt many of those which were entitled to
legal support were originally erected by the more prominent of the settlers. An
interesting case of temple endowment is that recorded of Grím Geitskor, who
travelled over all Iceland to find the most suitable spot for holding the
yearly assembly. For his trouble he received a 'penny' from every man in the
island, and this money he gave to the temples. One of the early settlers in the
east of Iceland is recorded as having taken formal possession of an unoccupied
piece of land for the behoof of a temple which he had built there. As
has already been mentioned, the inner part of the temple was more particularly
the sacred place, where stood the altar and the images of the gods. The main
part of the building served as a kind of hall, in which were held the
entertainments which followed upon the sacrifices, and at which the flesh of
the slain animals was eaten. As in the ordinary halls, there were fires in the
middle of the floor and seats down each side. In some of the sagas dealing with
prehistoric times in Sweden mention is made of a dísar-sal (in
connection with the worship of the dísir: see p. 33). What relation this
had to the usual temple is not clear: it has been supposed to be no more than
another name for the temple-hall, but this is not at all certain. The
temple being a holy place, there were naturally certain restrictions attached
to it, of which a prominent one was that no weapons were to be taken inside it.
This is clearly illustrated by an incident in Vatnsdæla Saga, where
Ingimund enters the temple first, and Hrafn the Norwegian follows him, wearing
his sword. Then Ingimund turned to him, and said, 'It is not the custom to
carry weapons in the temple, and you will come under the wrath of the gods
unless you make amends for it.' When Olaf Tryggvason entered the temple of
Mærin in Thrandheim, he carried a gold-mounted staff, but his own men and those
belonging to the district were weaponless. Another
offence which is frequently mentioned is that of slaying a man in a holy place;
in this connection, however, the regular word used is not hof but vé,
which has a more general meaning. One who committed this offence incurred the
penalty of outlawry, and was designated by the name of vargr í véum,
'wolf in holy places.' The same view of bloodshed as a crime against the
sanctity of a holy place is illustrated in the cases of Thorsness and
Stödvar-firth in Iceland, where the killing of anything was forbidden. In the
case of Thorsness it was decided, after a battle had taken place there, that it
was defiled by the blood that had fallen on it, and 'was now no more holy than
other places.' Along
with the timber-buildings known as hof, there is frequent mention, both
in the historical and legendary sources, of other sacred places called hörgar.
In its simplest form the hörg was evidently a kind of stone-altar or
sacrificial cairn standing in the open air; in modern Norwegian and Icelandic
the word is applied to a mountain-top. This is most clearly indicated by the
words of Hyndlu-ljóð, where Freyja says of Ottar, 'He made me a hörg,
piled up with stones; now these stones are turned to glass. He reddened it in
the fresh blood of oxen. Ottar always believed in the goddesses.' In contrast
to the burning of temples, the usual expression for the destroying of hörgar
is 'breaking,' which also indicates a structure of stones. In some cases,
however, the name of hörg seems to be applied to something more
approaching the nature of the hof; this not only appears to be implied
in the use of 'timbered,' which occurs in at least two poetic passages, but is
also suggested by the wording of the old Norwegian law, 'if a man raises a
mound (haug), or makes a house, and calls it a hörg,' etc. The
stone altars or cairns would naturally be more primitive places of worship than
the temples, but they continued in use along with these down to the
disappearance of the old religion. The altar in the temple, indeed, was no
doubt the representative of the earlier and ruder one in the open air, for both
are spoken of as being 'reddened' with the blood of the sacrifice. It
has been already made clear that the gods worshipped were represented in the
temples by images, which in the historical accounts are called by the names of líkneski
('likeness') and skurð-goð ('carved gods,' probably an epithet applied
by Christians). The description given by Adam of Bremen of those which stood in
the temple at Upsala has already been quoted (p. 4); here it is only necessary
to add that in no other writing of historical value is there any mention of an
image of Odin. With Thor the case is very different. Another image of this
deity is mentioned by Adam himself, who relates that about the year 1030 an
English missionary in Sweden found it standing in the assembly-place of the
heathens. In his religious zeal he smashed it with an axe, and was at once put
to death by the angry worshippers. Images of Thor are also frequently referred
to in the Icelandic sagas. In the year 998, when King Olaf Tryggvason was
christianising Norway, he entered the temple at Mærin in Thrandheim, 'and when
the king came where the gods were, there sat Thor, adorned with gold and
silver, and was most honoured of all the gods.' In the fullest account of this
incident it is stated that the image was seated in a splendid chariot, to which
were harnessed two goats beautifully carved out of wood; both chariot and goats
were on wheels, and the cords attached to the goats' horns were of silver. Thor
in his chariot is also mentioned as one of the images in the temple belonging
to Earl Hákon and Gudbrand in the Dales, which is described in Njál's Saga.
There is no mention of the chariot, however, in the account of this image given
in connection with King Olaf's visit to the Dales in 1021. There it is said to
have been 'of great stature, and hollow inside, with the hammer in his hand;
under him there is a kind of pedestal or platform, on which he stands when he
is outside; and on him there is no lack of gold and silver.' This image was
carried out to the place where the people of the district held their meeting with
Olaf, and those already assembled there paid homage to it. It was set down in
the middle of the ground, and on one side of it sat the heathens, and on the
other the king and his followers. It is also related that at the battle of
Svöldr in the year 1000, Earl Eirík had an image of Thor in the prow of his
ship, but threw it aside and put a cross in its place when he found his men
unable to board Olaf Tryggvason's vessel. Mention
has already been made (pp. 7-8) of the likeness of Thor carved on the chief pillars
of the temple in Mostr, and no doubt similar representations of the god were
not uncommon. In that part of the story of Thormod the poet which takes place
in Greenland, about 1027, a large chair is described as having on its back an
image of Thor with his hammer. That
some at least of the other gods were similarly represented in the temples may
be assumed as beyond doubt, but the evidence on this point is very scanty. It
seems likely that there was an image of Frey at Thrandheim, and it is highly
probable that this god would be largely figured in Sweden, although the texts
in which there is mention of this are of a very legendary character. It is
doubtful, also, whether any reliance can be placed on the passage in Droplaugarsona
Saga, which describes Frey and Thor as sitting on the lower bench in a
temple, while Frigg and Freyja occupied the higher. More historical, perhaps,
is the image of Frey which ornamented the talisman given by King Harald to
Ingimund (p. 25). In the traditions connected with Earl Hákon there are several references to an image of Thorgerd. The earl is related to have taken Sigmund Brestisson to a secluded building in the forest, in which there were 'a number of gods.' At the inner end of the house was the image of a woman splendidly dressed. What follows is of a legendary character, but the building and image appear again in the story of Olaf Tryggvason, who not only stripped Thorgerd of all her 'gold and silver and good clothes,' but dragged the image at a horse's tail, knocked it to pieces with a club, and finally burned it along with that of Frey. In Njál's Saga, Earl Hákon and Gudbrand are said to have had a great temple in the Dales in which there were images of Thorgerd and Irpa; the former was as tall as a full-grown man, and had a large gold ring on her arm and a hood on her head. These accounts may have a foundation in fact, but that given in Harðar Saga of a temple in Iceland with an image of Thorgerd is probably mere invention, perhaps an echo of the passage in Njál's Saga. _____________________________________
1 In the ceremony of entering into 'foster-brotherhood,' each
person swore to avenge the other, 'and named all the gods as witnesses.' |