Web
and Book design image, Copyright, Kellscraft Studio 1999-2006 (Return to Web Text-ures) |
(HOME) |
A MONTH’S MUSIC. THE
morning of
May-day was bright and spring-like, and should have been signalized, it
seemed
to me, by the advent of a goodly number of birds; but the only
new-comer to be
found was a single black-and-white creeper. Glad as I was to see this
lowly
acquaintance back again after his seven months’ absence, and natural as
he
looked on the edge of Warbler Swamp, bobbing along the branches in his
own
unique, end-for-end fashion, there was no resisting a sensation of
disappointment. Why could not the wood thrush have been punctual? He would have made the woods
ring with an ode
worthy of the festival. Possibly the hermits — who had been with us for
several
days in silence — divined my thoughts. At all events, one of them
presently
broke into a song — the first Hylocichla
note of the year. Never was voice more beautiful. Like the poet’s
dream, it
“left my after-morn content.” It is too
much to
be expected that the wood thrush should hold himself bound to appear at
a given
point on a fixed date. How can we know the multitude of reasons, any
one of
which may detain him for twenty-four hours, or even for a week? It is
enough
for us to be assured, in general, that the first ten days of the month
will
bring this master of the choir. The present season he arrived on the
6th — the
veery with him; last year he was absent until the 8th; while on the two
years
preceding he assisted at the observance of May-day. All in
all, I must
esteem this thrush our greatest singer; although the hermit might
dispute the
palm, perhaps, but that he is merely a semiannual visitor in most parts
of
Massachusetts. If perfection be held to consist in the absence of flaw,
the
hermit’s is unquestionably the more nearly perfect song of the two.
Whatever he
attempts is done beyond criticism; but his range and variety are far
less than
his rival’s, and, for my part, I can forgive the latter if now and then
he
reaches after a note lying a little beyond his best voice, and withal
is too
commonly wanting in that absolute simplicity and ease which lend such
an
ineffable charm to the performance of the hermit and the veery.
Shakespeare is
not a faultless poet, but in the existing state of public opinion it
will
hardly do to set Gray above him. In the
course of
the month about which I am now writing (May, 1884) I was favored with
thrush
music to a quite unwonted degree. With the exception of the varied
thrush (a
New-Englander by accident only) and the mocking-bird, there was not one
of our
Massachusetts representatives of the family who did not put me in his
debt. The
robin, the brown thrush, the catbird, the wood thrush, the veery, and
even the
hermit (what a magnificent sextette!) — so many I counted upon hearing,
as a
matter of course; but when to these were added the Arctic thrushes —
the
olive-backed and the gray-cheeked — I gladly confessed surprise. I had
never heard
either species before, south of the White Mountains; nor, as far as I
then
knew, had anybody else been more fortunate than myself. Yet the birds
themselves were seemingly-unaware of doing anything new or noteworthy.
This was
especially the case with the olive-backs; and after listening to them
for three
days in succession I began to suspect that they were doing nothing new,
— that
they had sung every spring in the same manner, only, in the midst of
the grand
May medley, my ears had somehow failed to take account of their
contribution.
Their fourth (and farewell) appearance was on the 23d, when they sang
both
morning and evening. At that time they were in a bit of swamp, among
some tall
birches, and as I caught the familiar and characteristic notes — a
brief
ascending spiral — I was almost ready to believe myself in some
primeval New
Hampshire forest; an illusion not a little aided by the frequent
lisping of
black-poll warblers, who chanced just then to be remarkably abundant. It was on
the same
day, and within a short distance of the same spot, that the Alice
thrushes, or
gray-cheeks, were in song. Their music was repeated a good many times,
but
unhappily it ceased whenever I tried to get near the birds. Then, as
Always, it
put me in mind of the veery’s effort, notwithstanding a certain part of
the
strain was quite out of the veery’s manner, and the whole was pitched
in
decidedly too high a key. It seemed, also, as if what I heard could not
be the
complete song; but I had been troubled with the same feeling on
previous
occasions, and a friend whose opportunities have been better than mine
reports
a similar experience; so that it is perhaps not uncharitable to
conclude that
the song, even at its best, is more or less broken and amorphous. In their
Northern
homes these gray-cheeks are excessively wild and unapproachable; but
while
traveling they are little if at all worse than their congeners in this
respect,
— taking short flights when disturbed, and often doing nothing more
than to hop
upon some low perch to reconnoitre the intruder. At the
risk of
being thought to reflect upon the acuteness of more competent
observers, I am
free to express my hope of hearing the music of both these noble
visitors again
another season. For it is noticeable how common such things tend to
become when
once they are discovered. An enthusiastic botanical collector told me
that for
years he searched far and near for the adder’s-tongue fern, till one
day he
stumbled upon it in a place over which he had long been in the habit of
passing.
Marking the peculiarities of the spot he straightway wrote to a kindred
spirit,
whom he knew to have been engaged in the same hunt, suggesting that he
would
probably find the coveted plants in a particular section of the meadow
back of
his own house (in Concord); and sure enough, the next day’s mail
brought an
envelope from his friend, inclosing specimens of Ophioglossum vulgatum, with the
laconic but sufficient
message, Eureka! There
are few
naturalists, I suspect, who could not narrate adventures of a like
sort. One such
befell me
during this same month, in connection with the wood wagtail, or
golden-crowned
thrush. Not many birds are more abundant than he in my neighborhood,
and I
fancied myself pretty well acquainted with his habits and manners.
Above all, I
had paid attention to his celebrated love-song, listening to it almost
daily
for several summers. Thus far it had invariably been given out in the
afternoon, and on the wing. To my mind, indeed, this was by far its
most
interesting feature (for in itself the song is by no means of
surpassing
beauty), and I had even been careful to record the earliest hour at
which I had
heard it — three o’clock P. M. But on the 6th of May aforesaid I
detected a
bird practicing this very tune in the morning, and from a perch! I set
the fact
down without hesitation as a wonder, — a purely exceptional occurrence,
the
repetition of which was not to be looked for. Anything might happen
once. Only
four days afterwards, however, at half-past six in the morning, I had
stooped
to gather some peculiarly bright-colored anemones (I can see the patch
of rosy
blossoms at this moment, although I am writing by a blazing fire while
the snow
is falling without), when my ear caught the same song again; and
keeping my
position, I soon descried the fellow stepping through the grass within
ten
yards of me, caroling as he walked. The hurried warble, with the common
Weechee, weechee, weechee
interjected in
the midst, was reiterated perhaps a dozen times, — the full evening
strain, but
in a rather subdued tone. He was under no excitement, and appeared to
be
entirely by himself; in fact, when he had made about half the circuit
round me
he flew into a low bush and proceeded to dress his feathers listlessly.
Probably what I had overheard was nothing more than a rehearsal. Within
a week
or two he would need to do his very best in winning the fair one of his
choice,
and for that supreme moment he had already put himself in training. The
wise-hearted and obliging little beau! I must have been the veriest
churl not
to wish him his pick of all the feminine wagtails in the wood. As for
the pink
anemones, they had done me a double kindness, in requital for which I
could
only carry them to the city, where, in their modesty, they would have
blushed
to a downright crimson had they been conscious of one-half the
admiration which
their loveliness called forth. Before the
end of
the month (it was on the morning of the 18th) I once more heard the
wagtail’s
song from the ground. This time the affair was anything but a
rehearsal. There
were two birds, — a lover and his lass, — and the wooing waxed fast and
furious. For that matter, it looked not so much like love-making as
like an
aggravated case of assault and battery. But, as I say, the male was
warbling,
and not improbably (so strange are the ways of the world), if he had
been a
whit less pugnacious in his addresses, his lady-love, who was plainly
well able
to take care of herself, would have thought him deficient in
earnestness. At
any rate, the wood wagtail is not the only bird whose courtship has the
appearance of a scrimmage; and I believe there are still tribes of men
among
whom similar practices prevail, although the greater part of our race
have
learned, by this time, to take somewhat less literally the old proverb,
“None
but the brave deserve the fair.” Love, it is true, is still recognized
as one
of the passions (in theory at least) even among the most highly
civilized
peoples; but the tendency is more and more to count it a tender passion. While I am
on the
subject of marriage I may as well mention the white-eyed vireo. It had
come to
be the 16th of the month, and as yet I had neither seen nor heard
anything of
this obstreperous genius; so I made a special pilgrimage to a certain
favorite
haunt of his — Woodcock Swamp — to ascertain if he had arrived. After
fifteen
minutes or more of waiting I was beginning to believe him still absent,
when he
burst out suddenly with his loud and unmistakable Chip-a-weé-o. “Who are you,
now?” the saucy fellow seemed to
say, “Who are you,
now?” Pretty
soon a pair of the birds appeared near me, the male protesting his
affection at
a frantic rate, and the female repelling his advances with a snappish
determination which might have driven a timid suitor desperate. He
posed before
her, puffing out his feathers, spreading his tail, and crying
hysterically, Yip, yip, yaah,
— the last note a
downright whine or snarl, worthy of the cat-bird. Poor soul! he was
well-nigh
beside himself, and could not take no
for an answer, even when the word was emphasized with an ugly dab of
his
beloved’s beak. The pair shortly disappeared in the swamp, and I was
not
privileged to witness the upshot of the battle; but I consoled myself
with
believing that Phyllis knew how far she could prudently carry her
resistance,
and would have the discretion to yield before her adorer’s heart was
irremediably broken. In this
instance
there was no misconceiving the meaning of the action; but whoever
watches birds
in the pairing season is often at his wit’s end to know what to make of
their
demonstrations. One morning a linnet chased another past me down the
road,
flying at the very top of his speed, and singing as he flew; not, to be
sure,
the full and copious warble such as is heard when the bird hovers, but
still a
lively tune. I looked on in astonishment. It seemed incredible that any
creature could sing while putting forth such tremendous muscular
exertions; and
yet, as if to show that this was a mere nothing to him, the finch had
no sooner
struck a perch than he broke forth again in his loudest and most
spirited
manner, and continued without a pause for two or three times the length
of his
longest ordinary efforts. “What lungs he must have!” I said to myself;
and at
once fell to wondering what could have stirred him up to such a pitch
of
excitement, and whether the bird he had been pursuing was male or
female. He would have
said, perhaps, if he had
said anything, that that was none of my business. What I
have been
remarking with regard to the proneness of newly discovered things to
become all
at once common was well illustrated for me about this time by these
same
linnets, or purple finches. One rainy morning, while making my
accustomed
rounds, enveloped in rubber, I stopped to notice a blue-headed vireo,
who, as I
soon perceived, was sitting lazily in the top of a locust-tree, looking
rather
disconsolate, and ejaculating with not more than half his customary
voice and
emphasis, Mary Ware! — Mary Ware!
His indolence struck me as very surprising for a vireo; still I had no
question
about his identity (he sat between me and the sun) till I changed my
position,
when behold! the vireo was a linnet. A strange performance, indeed!
What could
have set this fluent vocalist to practicing exercises of such an
inferior, disconnected,
piecemeal sort? Within the next week or two, however, the same game was
played
upon me several times, and in different places. No doubt the trick is
an old
one, familiar to many observers, but to me it had all the charm of
novelty. There are
no birds
so conservative but that they will now and then indulge in some
unexpected
stroke of originality. Few are more artless and regular in their
musical
efforts than the pine warblers; yet I have seen one of these sitting at
the tip
of a tree, and repeating a trill which toward the close invariably
declined by
an interval of perhaps three tones. Even the chipping sparrow, whose
lay is yet
more monotonous and formal than the pine warbler’s, is not absolutely
confined
to his score. I once heard him when his trill was divided into two
portions,
the concluding half being mach higher than the other — unless my ear
was at
fault, exactly an octave higher. This singular refrain was given out
six or
eight times without the slightest alteration. Such freaks as these,
however,
are different from the linnet’s Mary
Ware,
inasmuch as they are certainly the idiosyncrasies of single birds, not
a part
of the artistic proficiency of the species as a whole. During
this month I
was lucky enough to close a little question which I had been holding
open for a
number of years concerning our very common and familiar black-throated
green
warbler. This species, as is well known, has two perfectly well-defined
tunes
of about equal length, entirely distinct from each other. My
uncertainty had
been as to whether the two are ever used by the same individual. I had
listened
a good many times, first and last, in hopes to settle the point, but
hitherto
without success. Now, however, a bird, while under my eye, delivered
both
songs, and then went on to give further proof of his versatility by
repeating
one of them minus the
final note.
This abbreviation, by the way, is not very infrequent with Dendroeca virens; and lie has
still
another variation, which I hear once in a while every season,
consisting of a
grace note introduced in the middle of the measure, in such a
connection as to
form what in musical language is denominated a turn. At my first
hearing of
this I looked upon it as the private property of the bird to whom I was
listening, — an improvement which he had accidentally hit upon. But it
is
clearly more than that; for besides hearing it in different seasons, I
have
noticed it in places a good distance apart. Perhaps, after the lapse of
ten
thousand years, more or less, the whole tribe of black-throated greens
will
have adopted it; and then, when some ornithologist chances to fall in
with an
old-fashioned specimen who still clings to the plain song as we now
commonly
hear it, he will fancy that
to be
the very latest modern improvement, and proceed forthwith to enlighten
the
scientific world with a description of the novelty. Hardly any
incident
of the month interested me more than a discovery (I must call it such,
although
I am almost ashamed to allude to it at all) which I made about the
black-capped
titmouse. For several mornings in succession I was greeted on waking by
the
trisyllabic minor whistle of a chickadee, who piped again and again not
far
from my window. There could be little doubt about its being the bird
that I
knew to be excavating a building site in one of our apple-trees; but I
was
usually not out-of-doors until about five o’clock, by which time the
music
always came to an end. So one day I rose half an hour earlier than
common on
purpose to have a look at my little matutinal serenader. My conjecture
proved
correct. There sat the tit, within a few feet of his apple-branch door,
throwing
back his head in the truest lyrical fashion, and calling Hear, hear me, with only a
breathing space
between the repetitions of the phrase. He was as plainly singing, and as completely
absorbed in his
work, as any thrasher or hermit thrush could have been. Heretofore I
had not
realized that these whistled notes were so strictly a song, and as such
set
apart from all the rest of the chickadee’s repertory of sweet sounds;
and I was
delighted to find my tiny pet recognizing thus unmistakably the
difference
between prose and poetry. But we
linger
unduly with these lesser lights of song. After the music of the Alice
and the
Swainson thrushes, the chief distinction of May, 1884, as far as my
Melrose
woods were concerned, was the entirely unexpected advent of a colony of
rose-breasted grosbeaks. For five seasons I had called these
hunting-grounds my
own, and during that time had seen perhaps about the same number of
specimens
of this royal species, always in the course of the vernal migration.
The
present year the first coiner was observed on the 15th — solitary and,
except
for an occasional monosyllable, silent. Only one more straggler, I
assumed. But
on the following morning I saw four others, all of them males in full
plumage,
and two of them in song. To one of these I attended for some time.
According to
my notes “he sang beautifully, although not with any excitement, nor as
if he
were doing his best. The tone was purer and smoother than the robin’s,
more
mellow and sympathetic, and the strain was especially characterized by
a
dropping to a fine contralto note at the end.” The next day I saw
nothing of my
new friends till toward night. Then, after tea, I strolled into the
chestnut
grove, and walking along the path, noticed a robin singing freely,
remarking the
fact because this noisy bird had been rather quiet of late. Just as I
passed
under him, however, it flashed upon me that the voice and song were not
exactly
the robin’s. They must be the rose-breast’s then; and stepping back to
look up,
I beheld him in gorgeous attire, perched in the top of an oak. He sang
and
sang, while I stood quietly listening. Pretty soon he repeated the
strain once
or twice in a softer voice, and I glanced up instinctively to see if a
female
were with him; but instead, there were two males sitting within a yard
of each
other. They flew off after a little, and I resumed my saunter. A party
of
chimney swifts were shooting hither and thither over the trees, a
single wood
thrush was chanting not far away, and in another direction a tanager
was
rehearsing his chip-cherr
with
characteristic assiduity. Presently I began to be puzzled by a note
which came
now from this side, now from that, and sounded like the squeak of a
pair of
rusty shears. My first conjecture about the origin of this hic it would hardly serve my
reputation to
make public; but I was not long in finding out that it was the
grosbeaks’ own,
and that, instead of three, there were at least twice that number of
these
brilliant strangers in the grove. Altogether, the half hour was one of
very
enjoyable excitement; and when, later in the evening, I sat down to my
note-book, I started off abruptly in a hortatory vein, — “Always take
another
walk!” In the
morning,
naturally enough, I again turned my steps toward the chestnut grove.
The
rose-breasts were still there, and one of them earned my thanks by
singing on
the wing, flying slowly — half-hovering, as it were — and singing the
ordinary
song, but more continuously than usual. That afternoon one of them was
in tune
at the same time with a robin, affording me the desired opportunity for
a
direct comparison. “It is really wonderful,” my record says, “how
nearly alike
the two songs are; but the robin’s tone is plainly inferior, — less
mellow and
full. In general, too, his strain is pitched higher; and, what perhaps
is the
most striking point of difference, it frequently ends with an attempt
at a note
which is a little out of reach, so that the voice breaks.” (This last
defect,
by the bye, the robin shares with his cousin the wood thrush, as
already
remarked.) A few days afterwards, to confirm my own impression about
the
likeness of the two songs, I called the attention of a friend with whom
I was
walking, to a grosbeak’s notes, and asked him what bird’s they were.
He, having
a good ear for matters of this kind, looked somewhat dazed at such an
inquiry,
but answered promptly, “Why, a
robin’s, of
course.” As one day after another passed, however, and I listened to
both
species in full voice on every hand, I came to feel that I had
overestimated
the resemblance. With increasing familiarity I discerned more and more
clearly
the respects in which the songs differed, and each came to have to my
ear an
individuality strictly its own. They were alike, doubtless, — as the
red-eyed
vireo’s and the blue-head’s are, — and yet they were not alike. Of one
thing I
grew better and better assured: the grosbeak is out of all comparison
the finer
musician of the two. To judge from my last-year’s friends, however, his
concert
season is very short — the more’s the pity. I begin to
perceive
(indeed it has been dawning upon me for some time) that our essay is
not to
fulfill the promise of its caption. Instead of the glorious fullness
and
variety of the month’s music (for May, in this latitude, is the musical
month
of months) the reader has been put off with a few of the more
exceptional
features of the carnival. He will overlook it, I trust; and as for the
great
body of the chorus, who have not been honored with so much as a
mention, they,
I am assured, are far too amiable to take offense at any such
unintentional
slight. Let me conclude, then, with transcribing from my note-book an
evening
entry or two. Music is never so sweet as at the twilight hour; and the
extracts
may serve at least as a convenient and quasi-artistic ending for a
paper which,
so to speak, has run away with its writer. The first is under date of
the
19th: “Walked, after dinner, in the Old Road, as I
have done often of late, and sat for a while at the entrance to Pyrola
Grove. A
wood thrush was singing not far off, and in the midst a Swainson thrush
vouchsafed a few measures. I wished the latter would continue, but was
thankful
for the little. A tanager called excitedly, Chip-cherr,
moving from tree to tree meanwhile, once to a birch in full sight, and
then
into the pine over my head. As it grew dark the crowd of warblers were
still to
be seen feeding busily, making the most of the lingering daylight. A
small-billed water thrush was teetering along a willow-branch, while
his
congeners, the oven-birds, were practicing their aerial hymn. One of
these went
past me as I stood by the roadside, rising very gradually into the air
and
repeating all the way, Chip,
chip, chip,
chip, till at last he broke into the warble, which was a
full half
longer than usual. He was evidently doing his prettiest. No vireos sang
after
sunset. A Maryland yellow-throat piped once or twice (he is habitually
an
evening musician), and the black-throated greens were in tune, but the
rest of
the warblers were otherwise engaged. Finally, just as a distant
whippoorwill
began to call, a towhee sang once from the woods; and a moment later
the
stillness was broken by the sudden outburst of a thrasher. ‘Now then,’
he
seemed to say, ‘if the rest of you are quite done, I will see what I can do.’ He kept on for two
or three
minutes in his best manner, and at the same time a pair of catbirds
were
whispering love together in the thicket. Then an ill-timed carriage
came
rattling along the road, and when it had passed, every bird’s voice was
hushed.
The hyla’s tremulous cry was the only musical sound to be heard. As I
started
away, one of these tree-frogs hopped out of my path, and I picked him
up at the
second or third attempt. What did he think, I wonder, when I turned him
on his
back to look at the disks at his finger-tips? Probably he supposed that
his
hour was come; but I had no evil designs upon him, — he was not to be
drowned
in alcohol at present. Walking homeward I heard the robin’s scream now
and
again; but the thrasher’s was the last song, as it deserved to be.” Two days
later I
find the following: “Into the woods by the Old Road. As I approached them, a little after sundown, a chipper was trilling, and song sparrows and golden warblers were singing, — as were the black-throated greens also, and the Maryland yellow-throats. A wood thrush called brusquely, but offered no further salute to the god of day at his departure. Oven-birds were taking to wing on the right and left. Then, as it grew dark, it grew silent, — except for the hylas, — till suddenly a field sparrow gave out his sweet strain once. After that all was quiet for another interval, till a thrasher from the hillside began to sing. He ceased, and once more there was stillness. All at once the tanager broke forth in a strangely excited way, blurting out his phrase two or three times and subsiding as abruptly as he had commenced. Some crisis in his love-making, I imagined. Now the last oven-bird launched into the air and let fall a little shower of melody, and a whippoorwill took up his chant afar off. This should have been the end; but a robin across the meadow thought otherwise, and set at work as if determined to make a night of it. Mr. Early-and-late, the robin’s name ought to be. As I left the wood the whippoorwill followed; coming nearer and nearer, till finally he overpassed me and sang with all his might (while I tried in vain to see him) from a tree or the wall, near the big buttonwood. He too is an early riser, only he rises before nightfall instead of before daylight.” |