Difficulties
A THOUSAND books have been written about
Japan; but among these, — setting aside artistic publications and works of a
purely special character, — the really precious volumes will be found to number
scarcely a score. This fact is due to the immense difficulty of perceiving and
comprehending what underlies the surface of Japanese life. No work fully
interpreting that life, — no work picturing Japan within and without,
historically and socially, psychologically and ethically, — can be written for
at least another fifty years. So vast and intricate the subject that the united
labour of a generation of scholars could not exhaust it, and so difficult that the
number of scholars willing to devote their time to it must always be small.
Even among the Japanese themselves, no scientific knowledge of their own
history is yet possible; because the means of obtaining that knowledge have not
yet been prepared, — though mountains of material have been collected. The want
of any good history upon a modern plan is but one of many discouraging wants.
Data for the study of sociology are still inaccessible to the Western
investigator. The early state of the family and the clan; the history of the differentiation
of classes; the history of the differentiation of political from religious law;
the history of restraints, and of their influence upon custom; the history of
regulative and cooperative conditions in the development of industry; the
history of ethics and æsthetics — all these and many other matters remain
obscure.
This essay of mine can serve in one direction
only as a contribution to the Western knowledge of Japan. But this direction is
not one of the least important. Hitherto the subject of Japanese religion has
been written of chiefly by the sworn enemies of that religion; by others it has
been almost entirely ignored. Yet while it continues to be ignored and
misrepresented, no real knowledge of Japan is possible. Any true comprehension
of social conditions requires more than a superficial acquaintance with
religious conditions. Even the industrial history of a people cannot be
understood without some knowledge of those religious traditions and customs
which regulate industrial life during the earlier stages of its development....
Or take the subject of art. Art in Japan is so intimately associated with
religion that any attempt to study it without extensive knowledge of beliefs
which it reflects, were mere waste of time. By art I do not mean only painting
and sculpture, but every kind of decoration, and most kinds of pictorial
representation, — the image on a boy's kite or a girl's battledore, not less
than the design upon a lacquered casket or enamelled vase, — the figures upon a
workman's towel not less than the pattern of the girdle of a princess, — the
shape of the paper-dog or the wooden rattle bought for a baby, not less than
the forms of those colossal Ni-Ō who guard the gateways of Buddhist temples....
And surely there can never be any just estimate made of Japanese literature,
until a study of that literature shall have been made h, some scholar, not only
able to understand Japanese beliefs, but able also to sympathize with them to
at least the same extent that our great humanists can sympathize with the
religion of Euripides, of Pindar, and of Theocritus, Let us ask ourselves how
much of English or French or German or Italian literature could be fully understood
without the slightest knowledge of the ancient and modern religions of the
Occident. I do not refer to distinctly religious creators, — to poets like
Milton or Dante, — but only to the fact that even one of Shakespeare's plays
must remain incomprehensible to a person knowing nothing either of Christian
beliefs or of the beliefs which preceded them. The real mastery of any European
tongue is impossible without a knowledge of European religion. The language of
even the unlettered is full of religious meaning: the proverbs and
household-phrases of the poor, the songs of the street, the speech of the
workshop, — all are infused with significations unimaginable by any one
ignorant of the faith of the people. Nobody knows this better than a man who
has passed many years in trying to teach English in Japan, to pupils whose faith
is utterly unlike our own, and whose ethics have been shaped by a totally
different social experience.
|