Web
and Book design, |
Click
Here to return to |
IN 1736
the Massachusetts General Court passed an Act whereby the Town of Boston was
authorized to build a Workhouse for the accommodation of idle and vagabond
persons, rogues, and tramps. This was done in 1738, the expense being met by
popular subscription. The new building adjoined the Bridewell, and extended,
partly in front of the latter, down the incline, facing the Common. Its lower portion
abutted on the western border of the Burying-Ground, and reached to the
northern line of the present Park Street Church lot, where the Granary then
stood. The Workhouse was a well-proportioned, brick building, having two
stories and a gabled roof. Its length was about one hundred and twenty-five
feet, and it contained a large common Hall.1
In
October, 1739, certain rules were adopted for the management of the
Institution. It was ordered that “the Mistress take care that the victuals be
well and seasonably dressed; the bread and beer prepared according to the
direction of the Overseers; that the rooms be swept, and the beds made every
day; and that the people be kept clean and neat in their apparel. It was also
specified that the common work of the House should consist in picking oakum,
and that such of the women as were capable, should be employed in carding and
spinning wool, flax and yarn; also cotton yarn for candlewick; knitting,
sewing, etc.” The inmates were forbidden to smoke tobacco in their beds, on
penalty of being denied smoking for one week.
It appears that the Workhouse was used as a Hospital for British soldiers during the period between the Battle of Bunker Hill and their departure from Boston in March, 1776. This fact is evident from the following deposition. Whether the large quantity of arsenic therein mentioned was left in the Workhouse with sinister intent or otherwise, is a matter of conjecture.
I, John
Warren, of Cambridge, Physician, testify and say that on or about the
twenty-ninth day of March, last past, I went into the Work House of the Town of
Boston, lately improved as an Hospital by the British Troops stationed in said
Town; and upon examining into the State of a large quantity of Medicine there
by them left; particularly in one Room, supposed to have been by them used as a
Medicinal Store Room; I found a great variety of medicinal articles laying upon
the Floor, some of which were contained in Papers, while others were scattered
upon the floor, loose. Amongst these I observed small quantities of what I
supposed to be arsenic; and then received Information from Doctor Daniel Scott,
that he had taken up a large quantity of said arsenic in large lumps, and
secured it in a Vessel. Upon receiving this Information, 42
I desired
him to let me view the arsenic; with which he complied; and I judged it to
amount to about the Quantity of twelve or fourteen pounds. Being much surprised
by this extraordinary Intelligence, I more minutely examined the Articles on
the Floor, and found them to be chiefly capital Articles, and those most
generally in demand. And judging them to be rendered intirely [sic] unfit for
use, advised Scott to let them remain, and by no means to meddle with them, as
I thought the utmost Hazard would attend Using of them. They were accordingly
suffered to remain, and no account was taken of them.
Then Dr.
John Warren made solemn oath to the truth of the above written deposition:
Before me
JAMES OTIS
a Justice
of the Peace throughout the Colony
|
The
French traveller, Brissot de Warville, who visited Boston in 1788, wrote that
“the Workhouse was not so peopled as one might expect. In a rising country,
where provisions are cheap, good morals predominate, and the number of thieves
and vagabonds is small. There are vermin attached to misery, and there is no
misery here.”
At a Town Meeting, March 12, 1821, a Committee was chosen to consider and report upon the subject of “Pauperism at large.” From the investigations of this Committee it was learned that the buildings on Park Street, formerly belonging to the Town, “consisted of two ranges, one of which was used as an Alms House, for the reception of persons whom it became a duty of charity to relieve from distress; and the other as a Work House, where disorderly and dissolute people were restrained of their liberty, and compelled to work for their support.” Between these two buildings there was a smaller one, called a Bridewell, with grated cells. This served as a House of Correction, for the confinement of such persons as were not amenable to milder treatment. These several Institutions were intended for the accommodation of all classes of the poor. But a distinction, previously neglected, was made between the virtuous and vicious. Enlightened public opinion demanded that innocent unfortunates should not be regarded as criminals, nor confined in the same institution with law-breakers. In the latter class the Town Records designate vagabonds, pilferers, beggars, night-prowlers, wantons, stubborn children, wandering fortune-tellers, and other individuals whose freedom from restraint was deemed a menace to the public welfare. As early as 1662 authority was given magistrates to cause the arrest of idle vagrants, and to confine them in a House of Correction.
1 The location of the Almshouse and Bridewell is shown in a sketch, idealized from Bonner’s Map (Edition of 1743) and from a study of the Surveys of the City Engineer’s Office. This sketch is in the possession of Dr. James B. Ayer.