Web
and Book design, Copyright, Kellscraft Studio 1999-2007 (Return to Web Text-ures) |
Click
Here to return to Friends on the Shelf Content Page Return to the Previous Chapter |
(HOME) |
IN DEFENSE OF THE
TRAVELER’S NOTE–BOOK IT is a
more or
less common habit of Americans to cry out against the conceit of
foreigners,
Englishmen especially, who, after a run through “the States,” publish
their
impressions of the country. These outcries — though that may seem too
strong a
word — are supposed to be quite independent of the character of the
comments in
question, whether favorable or unfavorable. In the tourist’s eyes,
Americans
may be an uninteresting, boastful, worldly-minded people. The magnitude
of our
lakes may not blind him to the imperfections of our newspapers, and in
spite of
Niagara and the prairies, he may esteem our politicians, for the most
part, a
vulgar and time-serving set. Whatever criticisms of this sort he in his
unwisdom may feel called upon to express are likely to have their
modicum of
truth; at least they would have, if any one but a foreigner were to
utter them.
Americans are not slow to say similar things of each other, and
especially of
their public men. Except on the Fourth of July, we are far from
constituting
anything fairly to be called a mutual admiration society. The
complaint, then,
is not that the tourist offers criticism of such and such a tenor, but
that he
takes it upon himself to offer any criticism at all. What business has
he with
“impressions of America” after a visit of a month or two? And even if
he has
impressions, why should he be so presumptuous as to print them? A great
people
cannot be understood after this haphazard, percursory fashion. True;
but the
objection is futile, if for no other reason, because it goes wide of
the mark.
The question is not of understanding a people, but of having something
to say
about them. Since the
world
began, men have traveled, and, having traveled, have recounted their
adventures. The two things go together, and are alike inevitable. And
the thing
that hath been, it is that which shall be. Some authors travel in other
men’s
books; some travel in the outward and literal sense of the word; and
both tell
as good a story as they can of the wonders they have seen. It is only
here and
there a philosopher who can sit at home and spin his web out of his own
insides.
Thoreau delighted to talk as if Concord were the centre and sum of the
world.
Everything grew there, everything happened there. Why should a Concord
man ever
stir beyond the town limits? Sure enough! And yet what are Thoreau’s
books but
records of his journeys: “A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers;
““The
Maine Woods;” “Cape Cod;” “A Yankee in Canada;” “Excursions.” With him,
as with
the rest of us, it was the volume he had just read that he liked to
talk about;
it was the country he had just seen that his pen naturally busied
itself with
describing. Even his one Concord book is really a book of travels. To
write it
he went into camp, that he might study the world on its off side, as it
were,
and feel his life new. In other
words, for
here we come to the pith of the matter, it is the fresh impression that
is
vivid, and therefore will have itself expressed. We may almost say that
it is
the only thing that can be expressed. This is what Bagehot had in mind.
“Those
who know a place or a person best,” he said, “are not those most likely
to
describe it best; their knowledge is so familiar that they cannot bring
it out
in words.” And this truth, partial though it be, and, like all truth,
liable to
misunderstanding and abuse, is the scribbling tourist’s encouragement,
and, if
he be supposed to need it, his perennial justification. More than
one
scholar has failed to produce the great work that was expected of him,
— that
he of all men seemed elected to produce, — simply because he put off
the doing
of it till his knowledge should be something like complete. So
monumental a
structure could not be too carefully prepared for, he thought: a
conscientiousness most scholarly and honorable, but deadly in its
result; for
by the time he had laid in his stores, he had lost the freshness of his
enthusiasm; a palsy had stricken his pen; and by and by the night came,
and his
knowledge perished with him. Writers of
travels,
whatever their shortcomings, fall into no error of this kind. They
strike while
the iron is hot; and whether their subject be Africa or America, that
is the
true method. The value of such literature depends on the observer’s
alertness,
fairness, good sense, and general competency, rather than upon the
length and
leisureliness of his journey. Time of itself never did much for a blind
man’s
vision; and to come back to our Englishman, he may run through America
in a
month, or spend a year in his note-taking, and in either event he will
discover
only what he came prepared to discover. If the photographic plate is
sensitive
enough, it may need but the briefest exposure. And anyhow, let the
picture turn
out never so badly, no irreparable harm is done. The object itself is
not
altered because its portrait is drawn awry. What we have to dread is
not the
foreigner’s unfair opinion of us, but our unfair opinion of the
foreigner. It
is our own thoughts that do us injury, not other men’s thoughts about
us. And
if this be too rare an atmosphere for comfortable every-day breathing,
we may
come at a similar result on lower ground. Who are we, that we should be
treated
better than the rest of the world? Must our feelings never be hurt,
because we
are Americans? Have we never learned that it is a man’s part to be
thankful for
intelligent and friendly criticism, and to bear all other in silence? Let
visitors to
“the States,” then, be “impressed;” and let them print their
impressions, the
more the better. Some of them will be shallow, some of them unkindly
and
prejudiced, some, perhaps, ignorantly and foolishly eulogistic. We
shall be
blamed for faults that are beyond our mending, and praised for virtues
that
were never ours, — if such virtues there be. At best, the criticism and
the
comment will fall a little short of inerrancy; for perfection is one of
the
lost arts, even in England; but in the sum many true things will be
said, and
in the end the cause of truth will be forwarded; and possibly, if a
thousand
English pens are thus employed, one of them may happen to make an
immortal
picture of the Great Republic as it now is, and as it will not be, for
better
or worse, a hundred years hence. Thus it is, at any rate, by one lucky
experimenter out of many, that immortal work is done. Some
critics, it is
true, would have literature, even current literature, to consist solely
of such
happy strokes. Let no man write anything till he can write a
masterpiece, they
say. Yes, and let no boy go near the water till he has learned to swim;
and
since crows have waxed destructive, let cornfields be planted hereafter
with no
outside rows; and lest malarial fevers should make an end of the human
race,
let all plains and valleys be filled up, and nothing remain but
mountains. In
short, seeing that failure has been the rule hitherto, let us abolish
rules,
and get on with exceptions alone; a condition of things curiously
prefigured in
certain Grammars of the Latin Language, of a kind still sorrowfully
remembered
by elderly people. A fine economy, surely, and well worth thinking
about. But
for the time being, till dreams become substantial, this present evil
world, as
we reverently call it, remembering its Creator, must be suffered to jog
along
in its ancient, expensive, wasteful-seeming, happy-go-lucky,
highly-exceptionable manner: a million seeds, and one tree; a million
books,
and one chef-d’oeuvre.
Classics are not yet produced of set purpose, nor do
they make their advent in royal isolation, starred and wearing the
laurel. They
come, as was said just now, with the crowd, the “spawn of the press,”
if they
come at all, and are only sifted out by the slow hand of time. And
meanwhile
their humbler fellows, missing of immortality, may nevertheless have
their day
and serve their turn. Readers, fortunately or unfortunately, are of
many
grades, and even the wisest of them — in some unwiser but not
infrequent mood —
desire not a classic, but something a shade less excellent. “There is
no book
that is acceptable, unless at certain seasons.” So said Milton; and the
saying
is true, even of “Paradise Lost.” In the great sea of literature there
is room
both for the big fish and for “the other fry.” Let us be thankful; and
if we
are scribblers, by nature or by conceit, let us scribble on. |